AEMD vs MBOT: Correlation
Aethlon Medical, Inc. (AEMD) and Microbot Medical Inc. (MBOT) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.33.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are AEMD and MBOT?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of AEMD and MBOT correlate at 0.33, moderate. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.27) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.27, with an annualized covariance of 3769.8 %².
In AEMD's tracked universe of 10 assets, MBOT sits right near the top at #3. The last year tells two different stories: MBOT led by 34.2 percentage points, -97.3% for AEMD against -63.1% for MBOT.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
AEMD vs MBOT: side by side
| AEMD (Aethlon Medical, Inc.) | MBOT (Microbot Medical Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -97.3% | -63.1% |
| 5-year return | -100.0% | -79.9% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 117.3% | 97.0% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.45 | 1.83 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -99.8% | -67.3% |
| Market cap | – | $0.1B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | AEMD | MBOT |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -84.9% | -59.9% |
| 2023 | -21.8% | -45.5% |
| 2024 | -60.7% | -31.7% |
| 2025 | -96.0% | +78.6% |
| 2026 | -84.3% | -25.0% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are AEMD and MBOT good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.33, AEMD and MBOT keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between AEMD and MBOT?
The AEMD/MBOT correlation stands at 0.33 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.27, 5 years: 0.27), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is MBOT a good diversifier for AEMD?
Reasonably. At 0.33, AEMD and MBOT keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.33 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.33 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/aemd-vs-mbot.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/aemd-vs-mbot/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: AEMD correlations · MBOT correlations
