PairBook
HomeACXP › ACXP vs VLTO

ACXP vs VLTO: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Acurx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ACXP) and Veralto (VLTO) carry a correlation of -0.20, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.20
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-741.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ACXP and VLTO?

On 3 years of weekly data the ACXP/VLTO correlation comes out at -0.20, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.20 over 1 year against -0.20 over 3. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -741.7 %².

By 3-year correlation, VLTO places #14 of the 32 assets tracked against ACXP. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with VLTO ahead by 62.1 points (-70.0% versus -7.9%). Note the risk asymmetry: ACXP runs 8.0 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ACXP vs VLTO: side by side

ACXP (Acurx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.)VLTO (Veralto)
1-year return-70.0%-7.9%
5-year return-98.5%n/a
Volatility (ann.)170.6%21.2%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.660.66
Max drawdown (3Y)-98.8%-27.1%
Market cap$24.0B
P/E (trailing)24.9
Dividend yield0.00%0.51%
Sector / categoryUS ListedIndustrials
Higher yield: VLTO 0.51% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: VLTO -27.1% vs -98.8%
-67%0%+83%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. ACXP · VLTO

Year-by-year returns

YearACXPVLTO
2022-7.9%
2023-3.8%
2024-78.7%+24.3%
2025-84.7%-1.6%
2026-41.4%-1.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ACXP and VLTO good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.20, ACXP and VLTO have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ACXP and VLTO?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.20 over 3 years, with -0.20 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.

Is VLTO a good diversifier for ACXP?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.20, ACXP and VLTO have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.20 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/acxp-vs-vlto.json

ACXP vs VLTO: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20ACXP vs VLTO-0.20

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![ACXP vs VLTO correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/acxp-vs-vlto.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/acxp-vs-vlto/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ACXP correlations · VLTO correlations