PairBook
HomeACXP › ACXP vs PCM

ACXP vs PCM: Correlation

How closely do Acurx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ACXP) and PCM Fund, Inc. (PCM) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.30, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.30
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.32
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.17
long-run
Ann. covariance
-979.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ACXP and PCM?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of ACXP and PCM correlate at -0.30, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.32 over 1 year against -0.30 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.17, with an annualized covariance of -979.5 %².

PCM is close to the least connected end of ACXP's tracked universe, ranking #30 of 32. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months PCM outperformed by 67.1 percentage points (-70.0% for ACXP against -2.9% for PCM). Risk is not evenly split, since ACXP carries 9.0 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ACXP vs PCM: side by side

ACXP (Acurx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.)PCM (PCM Fund, Inc.)
1-year return-70.0%-2.9%
5-year return-98.5%-19.9%
Volatility (ann.)170.6%19.0%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.660.46
Max drawdown (3Y)-98.8%-27.1%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)9.6
Dividend yield0.00%14.25%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: PCM 14.25% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: PCM -27.1% vs -98.8%Higher 5y return: PCM -19.9% vs -98.5%
-67%0%+83%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). ACXP · PCM

Year-by-year returns

YearACXPPCM
2022-7.9%-19.7%
2023-3.8%+12.4%
2024-78.7%+8.8%
2025-84.7%-10.1%
2026-41.4%-4.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ACXP and PCM good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.30 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ACXP and PCM?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ACXP and PCM is -0.30 over 3 years, -0.32 over 1 year and -0.17 over 5 years.

Is PCM a good diversifier for ACXP?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.30 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.30 mean?

A reading of -0.30 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/acxp-vs-pcm.json

ACXP vs PCM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.30ACXP vs PCM-0.30

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![ACXP vs PCM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/acxp-vs-pcm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/acxp-vs-pcm/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ACXP correlations · PCM correlations