PairBook
HomeACXP › ACXP vs LOW

ACXP vs LOW: Correlation

Acurx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ACXP) and Lowe's (LOW) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.22.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.32
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.13
long-run
Ann. covariance
-921.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ACXP and LOW?

Over the past 3 years, ACXP and LOW moved with a correlation of -0.22, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.32) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.13, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -921.4 %².

Within ACXP's tracked universe of 32 assets, LOW comes in at #22 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: LOW led by 51.6 percentage points, -70.0% for ACXP against -18.4% for LOW. Note the risk asymmetry: ACXP runs 6.9 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ACXP vs LOW: side by side

ACXP (Acurx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.)LOW (Lowe's)
1-year return-70.0%-18.4%
5-year return-98.5%+11.1%
Volatility (ann.)170.6%24.8%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.660.83
Max drawdown (3Y)-98.8%-29.0%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)17.8
Dividend yield0.00%2.31%
Sector / categoryUS ListedConsumer Discretionary
Higher yield: LOW 2.31% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: LOW -29.0% vs -98.8%Higher 5y return: LOW +11.1% vs -98.5%
-67%0%+83%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. ACXP · LOW

Year-by-year returns

YearACXPLOW
2022-7.9%-21.5%
2023-3.8%+14.0%
2024-78.7%+13.0%
2025-84.7%-0.3%
2026-41.4%-12.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ACXP and LOW good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.22, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ACXP and LOW?

The ACXP/LOW correlation stands at -0.22 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.32, 5 years: -0.13), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is LOW a good diversifier for ACXP?

Yes: at -0.22, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

A reading of -0.22 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/acxp-vs-low.json

ACXP vs LOW: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22ACXP vs LOW-0.22

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![ACXP vs LOW correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/acxp-vs-low.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/acxp-vs-low/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ACXP correlations · LOW correlations