ACXP vs BF.B: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Acurx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ACXP) and Brown–Forman (BF.B) carry a correlation of -0.22, a negative link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are ACXP and BF.B?
On 3 years of weekly data the ACXP/BF.B correlation comes out at -0.22, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.28 over 1 year against -0.22 over 3. The 5-year figure is -0.17, and annualized covariance runs at -1272.4 %².
Among the 32 assets we track against ACXP, BF.B ranks #20 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with BF.B ahead by 62.6 points (-70.0% versus -7.4%). Risk is not evenly split, since ACXP carries 5.0 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
ACXP vs BF.B: side by side
| ACXP (Acurx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) | BF.B (Brown–Forman) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -70.0% | -7.4% |
| 5-year return | -98.5% | -56.8% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 170.6% | 34.0% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -0.66 | 0.51 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -98.8% | -64.8% |
| Market cap | – | $12.5B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 18.3 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 3.26% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Consumer Staples |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | ACXP | BF.B |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -7.9% | -8.9% |
| 2023 | -3.8% | -11.9% |
| 2024 | -78.7% | -32.2% |
| 2025 | -84.7% | -29.3% |
| 2026 | -41.4% | +6.6% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are ACXP and BF.B good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between ACXP and BF.B?
The ACXP/BF.B correlation stands at -0.22 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.28, 5 years: -0.17), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is BF.B a good diversifier for ACXP?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.22 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/acxp-vs-bf-b.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/acxp-vs-bf-b/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: ACXP correlations · BF.B correlations
