PairBook
HomeACRV › ACRV vs ALMS

ACRV vs ALMS: Correlation

Acrivon Therapeutics, Inc. (ACRV) and Alumis Inc. (ALMS) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.28.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.28
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.30
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-3164.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ACRV and ALMS?

On 3 years of weekly data the ACRV/ALMS correlation comes out at -0.28, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.30 over 1 year against -0.28 over 3. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -3164.1 %².

Among the 14 assets we track against ACRV, ALMS sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #12. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with ALMS ahead by 313.6 points (+58.1% versus +371.7%).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ACRV vs ALMS: side by side

ACRV (Acrivon Therapeutics, Inc.)ALMS (Alumis Inc.)
1-year return+58.1%+371.7%
5-year returnn/an/a
Volatility (ann.)94.2%130.0%
Beta vs S&P 5001.58-1.50
Max drawdown (3Y)-91.3%-78.9%
Market cap$0.1B$3.0B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: ALMS -78.9% vs -91.3%
-11%0%+558%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. ACRV · ALMS

Year-by-year returns

YearACRVALMS
2023-57.3%
2024+22.4%
2025-60.0%+24.2%
2026-10.8%+137.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ACRV and ALMS good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.28 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ACRV and ALMS?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ACRV and ALMS is -0.28 over 3 years, -0.30 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is ALMS a good diversifier for ACRV?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.28 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.28 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.28 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/acrv-vs-alms.json

ACRV vs ALMS: 3-year weekly correlation -0.28ACRV vs ALMS-0.28

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![ACRV vs ALMS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/acrv-vs-alms.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/acrv-vs-alms/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ACRV correlations · ALMS correlations