PairBook
HomeACH › ACH vs ONFO

ACH vs ONFO: Correlation

How closely do Accendra Health, Inc. (ACH) and Onfolio Holdings Inc. (ONFO) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.35, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.35
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.51
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.32
long-run
Ann. covariance
-130044.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ACH and ONFO?

Over the past 3 years, ACH and ONFO moved with a correlation of -0.35, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.51) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.35). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.32, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -130044.1 %².

Among the 16 assets we track against ACH, ONFO sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #13. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with ONFO ahead by 111.8 points (-75.3% versus +36.5%). Risk is not evenly split, since ONFO carries 46.6 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ACH vs ONFO: side by side

ACH (Accendra Health, Inc.)ONFO (Onfolio Holdings Inc.)
1-year return-75.3%+36.5%
5-year return-96.8%n/a
Volatility (ann.)89.1%4150.5%
Beta vs S&P 5001.376.65
Max drawdown (3Y)-96.6%-99.3%
Market cap$0.1B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: ACH -96.6% vs -99.3%
-96%0%+287%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). ACH · ONFO

Year-by-year returns

YearACHONFO
2022-55.1%
2023-1.3%-66.4%
2024-32.2%+162.7%
2025-78.6%-49.3%
2026-56.8%+109.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ACH and ONFO good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.35, ACH and ONFO have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ACH and ONFO?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ACH and ONFO is -0.35 over 3 years, -0.51 over 1 year and -0.32 over 5 years.

Is ONFO a good diversifier for ACH?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.35, ACH and ONFO have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.35 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.35 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ach-vs-onfo.json

ACH vs ONFO: 3-year weekly correlation -0.35ACH vs ONFO-0.35

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![ACH vs ONFO correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ach-vs-onfo.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ach-vs-onfo/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ACH correlations · ONFO correlations