PairBook
HomeACH › ACH vs NXTT

ACH vs NXTT: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Accendra Health, Inc. (ACH) and Next Technology Holding Inc. (NXTT) carry a correlation of -0.35, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.35
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.51
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.32
long-run
Ann. covariance
-240432.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ACH and NXTT?

On 3 years of weekly data the ACH/NXTT correlation comes out at -0.35, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.51) than the 3-year average (-0.35). The 5-year figure is -0.32, and annualized covariance runs at -240432.0 %².

NXTT is close to the least connected end of ACH's tracked universe, ranking #12 of 16. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with ACH ahead by 19.0 points (-75.3% versus -94.3%). One caveat on sizing: NXTT is 86.5 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ACH vs NXTT: side by side

ACH (Accendra Health, Inc.)NXTT (Next Technology Holding Inc.)
1-year return-75.3%-94.3%
5-year return-96.8%-100.0%
Volatility (ann.)89.1%7704.0%
Beta vs S&P 5001.378.14
Max drawdown (3Y)-96.6%-100.0%
Market cap$0.1B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: ACH -96.6% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: ACH -96.8% vs -100.0%
-100%0%+67%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. ACH · NXTT

Year-by-year returns

YearACHNXTT
2022-55.1%
2023-1.3%-93.9%
2024-32.2%-36.6%
2025-78.6%-98.8%
2026-56.8%+14.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ACH and NXTT good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.35, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ACH and NXTT?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ACH and NXTT is -0.35 over 3 years, -0.51 over 1 year and -0.32 over 5 years.

Is NXTT a good diversifier for ACH?

Yes: at -0.35, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.35 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ach-vs-nxtt.json

ACH vs NXTT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.35ACH vs NXTT-0.35

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![ACH vs NXTT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ach-vs-nxtt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ach-vs-nxtt/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ACH correlations · NXTT correlations