PairBook
HomeACH › ACH vs NRT

ACH vs NRT: Correlation

Accendra Health, Inc. (ACH) and North European Oil Royality Trust (NRT) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.28.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.28
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.24
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.14
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1282.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ACH and NRT?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of ACH and NRT correlate at -0.28, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.24 over 1 year against -0.28 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.14, with an annualized covariance of -1282.7 %².

Within ACH's tracked universe of 16 assets, NRT comes in at #9 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: NRT led by 160.5 percentage points, -75.3% for ACH against +85.2% for NRT. One caveat on sizing: ACH is 1.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ACH vs NRT: side by side

ACH (Accendra Health, Inc.)NRT (North European Oil Royality Trust)
1-year return-75.3%+85.2%
5-year return-96.8%+131.5%
Volatility (ann.)89.1%51.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.37-0.42
Max drawdown (3Y)-96.6%-66.1%
Market cap$0.1B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)8.4
Dividend yield0.00%11.95%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: NRT 11.95% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: NRT -66.1% vs -96.6%Higher 5y return: NRT +131.5% vs -96.8%
-83%0%+107%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. ACH · NRT

Year-by-year returns

YearACHNRT
2022-55.1%+41.9%
2023-1.3%-46.5%
2024-32.2%-25.3%
2025-78.6%+88.4%
2026-56.8%+41.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ACH and NRT good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.28 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ACH and NRT?

The ACH/NRT correlation stands at -0.28 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.24, 5 years: -0.14), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is NRT a good diversifier for ACH?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.28 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.28 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ach-vs-nrt.json

ACH vs NRT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.28ACH vs NRT-0.28

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![ACH vs NRT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ach-vs-nrt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ach-vs-nrt/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ACH correlations · NRT correlations