PairBook
HomeACH › ACH vs AEHL

ACH vs AEHL: Correlation

Accendra Health, Inc. (ACH) and Antelope Enterprise Holdings Limited - Class A (AEHL) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.33.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.33
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.48
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.29
long-run
Ann. covariance
-35567.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ACH and AEHL?

Over the past 3 years, ACH and AEHL moved with a correlation of -0.33, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.48) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.33). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.29, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -35567.5 %².

By 3-year correlation, AEHL places #10 of the 16 assets tracked against ACH. Their 12-month results are close: -75.3% for ACH against -73.6% for AEHL. One caveat on sizing: AEHL is 13.4 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ACH vs AEHL: side by side

ACH (Accendra Health, Inc.)AEHL (Antelope Enterprise Holdings Limited - Class A)
1-year return-75.3%-73.6%
5-year return-96.8%-99.9%
Volatility (ann.)89.1%1193.4%
Beta vs S&P 5001.371.91
Max drawdown (3Y)-96.6%-100.0%
Market cap$0.1B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: ACH -96.6% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: ACH -96.8% vs -99.9%
-99%0%+5%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). ACH · AEHL

Year-by-year returns

YearACHAEHL
2022-55.1%-62.9%
2023-1.3%-56.1%
2024-32.2%-91.1%
2025-78.6%-80.8%
2026-56.8%-52.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ACH and AEHL good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.33, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ACH and AEHL?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ACH and AEHL is -0.33 over 3 years, -0.48 over 1 year and -0.29 over 5 years.

Is AEHL a good diversifier for ACH?

Yes: at -0.33, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.33 mean?

A reading of -0.33 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ach-vs-aehl.json

ACH vs AEHL: 3-year weekly correlation -0.33ACH vs AEHL-0.33

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![ACH vs AEHL correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ach-vs-aehl.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ach-vs-aehl/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ACH correlations · AEHL correlations