WY vs ZCMD: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Weyerhaeuser (WY) and Zhongchao Inc. - Class A (ZCMD) carry a correlation of -0.19, a negative link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are WY and ZCMD?
On 3 years of weekly data the WY/ZCMD correlation comes out at -0.19, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.18) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.14, and annualized covariance runs at -669.1 %².
Out of 44 assets tracked against WY, ZCMD lands near the bottom at #42. The last year tells two different stories: WY led by 93.8 percentage points, -6.1% for WY against -99.9% for ZCMD. One caveat on sizing: ZCMD is 5.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
WY vs ZCMD: side by side
| WY (Weyerhaeuser) | ZCMD (Zhongchao Inc. - Class A) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -6.1% | -99.9% |
| 5-year return | -19.5% | -100.0% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 24.8% | 141.8% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.64 | 0.59 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -38.0% | -100.0% |
| Market cap | $17.1B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 36.5 | – |
| Dividend yield | 3.49% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | Real Estate | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | WY | ZCMD |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -20.4% | -35.4% |
| 2023 | +18.0% | -69.5% |
| 2024 | -16.6% | -53.8% |
| 2025 | -13.0% | -72.2% |
| 2026 | +1.8% | -99.7% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are WY and ZCMD good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between WY and ZCMD?
The WY/ZCMD correlation stands at -0.19 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.18, 5 years: -0.14), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is ZCMD a good diversifier for WY?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?
A reading of -0.19 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/wy-vs-zcmd.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/wy-vs-zcmd/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: WY correlations · ZCMD correlations
