PairBook
HomeWINA › WINA vs XBIO

WINA vs XBIO: Correlation

How closely do Winmark Corporation (WINA) and Xenetic Biosciences, Inc. (XBIO) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.22, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.34
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.09
long-run
Ann. covariance
-707.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are WINA and XBIO?

Over the past 3 years, WINA and XBIO moved with a correlation of -0.22, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.34) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.22). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.09, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -707.9 %².

Out of 12 assets tracked against WINA, XBIO lands near the bottom at #9. The last year tells two different stories: XBIO led by 64.1 percentage points, -24.3% for WINA against +39.8% for XBIO. Risk is not evenly split, since XBIO carries 2.5 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

WINA vs XBIO: side by side

WINA (Winmark Corporation)XBIO (Xenetic Biosciences, Inc.)
1-year return-24.3%+39.8%
5-year return+89.5%-86.8%
Volatility (ann.)35.4%90.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.470.46
Max drawdown (3Y)-34.0%-80.5%
Market cap$1.2B
P/E (trailing)30.4
Dividend yield1.13%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: WINA 1.13% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: WINA -34.0% vs -80.5%Higher 5y return: WINA +89.5% vs -86.8%
-32%0%+106%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. WINA · XBIO

Year-by-year returns

YearWINAXBIO
2022-2.8%-77.9%
2023+82.6%+21.1%
2024-3.3%+15.7%
2025+6.4%-45.6%
2026-16.6%+82.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are WINA and XBIO good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.22, WINA and XBIO have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between WINA and XBIO?

The WINA/XBIO correlation stands at -0.22 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.34, 5 years: -0.09), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is XBIO a good diversifier for WINA?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.22, WINA and XBIO have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

A reading of -0.22 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/wina-vs-xbio.json

WINA vs XBIO: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22WINA vs XBIO-0.22

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![WINA vs XBIO correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/wina-vs-xbio.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/wina-vs-xbio/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: WINA correlations · XBIO correlations