PairBook
HomeVXZ › VXZ vs ZTR

VXZ vs ZTR: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) and Virtus Total Return Fund Inc. (ZTR) carry a correlation of -0.41, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.41
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.29
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.36
long-run
Ann. covariance
-146.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are VXZ and ZTR?

On 3 years of weekly data the VXZ/ZTR correlation comes out at -0.41, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.29 versus -0.41 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is -0.36, and annualized covariance runs at -146.9 %².

By 3-year correlation, ZTR places #2016 of the 2840 assets tracked against VXZ. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with ZTR ahead by 34.1 points (-16.1% versus +18.0%). One caveat on sizing: VXZ is 1.8 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

VXZ vs ZTR: side by side

VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)ZTR (Virtus Total Return Fund Inc.)
1-year return-16.1%+18.0%
5-year return-53.1%+27.0%
Volatility (ann.)25.6%14.0%
Beta vs S&P 500-1.310.40
Max drawdown (3Y)-36.4%-18.3%
Market cap$0.3B
P/E (trailing)5.7
Dividend yield8.75%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: ZTR -18.3% vs -36.4%Higher 5y return: ZTR +27.0% vs -53.1%
-16%0%+20%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). VXZ · ZTR

Year-by-year returns

YearVXZZTR
2022+0.5%-21.3%
2023-44.0%-3.2%
2024-12.7%+18.3%
2025+5.7%+18.6%
2026-10.5%+15.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are VXZ and ZTR good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.41, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between VXZ and ZTR?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between VXZ and ZTR is -0.41 over 3 years, -0.29 over 1 year and -0.36 over 5 years.

Is ZTR a good diversifier for VXZ?

Yes: at -0.41, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.41 mean?

A reading of -0.41 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/vxz-vs-ztr.json

VXZ vs ZTR: 3-year weekly correlation -0.41VXZ vs ZTR-0.41

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![VXZ vs ZTR correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/vxz-vs-ztr.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/vxz-vs-ztr/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: VXZ correlations · ZTR correlations