PairBook
HomeVXZ › VXZ vs ZS

VXZ vs ZS: Correlation

iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) and Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.33.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.33
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.03
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.34
long-run
Ann. covariance
-387.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are VXZ and ZS?

On 3 years of weekly data the VXZ/ZS correlation comes out at -0.33, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.03) than the 3-year average (-0.33). The 5-year figure is -0.34, and annualized covariance runs at -387.2 %².

Within VXZ's tracked universe of 2840 assets, ZS comes in at #1286 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: VXZ led by 15.3 percentage points, -16.1% for VXZ against -31.4% for ZS. Note the risk asymmetry: ZS runs 1.8 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

VXZ vs ZS: side by side

VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)ZS (Zscaler, Inc.)
1-year return-16.1%-31.4%
5-year return-53.1%-32.7%
Volatility (ann.)25.6%45.7%
Beta vs S&P 500-1.311.47
Max drawdown (3Y)-36.4%-64.9%
Market cap$30.3B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -64.9%Higher 5y return: ZS -32.7% vs -53.1%
-57%0%+21%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. VXZ · ZS

Year-by-year returns

YearVXZZS
2022+0.5%-65.2%
2023-44.0%+98.0%
2024-12.7%-18.6%
2025+5.7%+24.7%
2026-10.5%-16.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are VXZ and ZS good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.33, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between VXZ and ZS?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.33 over 3 years, with 0.03 over the last year and -0.34 over 5 years.

Is ZS a good diversifier for VXZ?

Yes: at -0.33, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.33 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/vxz-vs-zs.json

VXZ vs ZS: 3-year weekly correlation -0.33VXZ vs ZS-0.33

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![VXZ vs ZS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/vxz-vs-zs.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/vxz-vs-zs/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: VXZ correlations · ZS correlations