PairBook
HomeVXZ › VXZ vs XLK

VXZ vs XLK: Correlation

iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.63.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.63
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.49
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.61
long-run
Ann. covariance
-384.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are VXZ and XLK?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of VXZ and XLK correlate at -0.63, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.49) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.63). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.61, with an annualized covariance of -384.4 %².

Among the 2840 assets we track against VXZ, XLK ranks #2783 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: XLK led by 59.5 percentage points, -16.1% for VXZ against +43.4% for XLK.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

VXZ vs XLK: side by side

VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)XLK (Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund)
1-year return-16.1%+43.4%
5-year return-53.1%+145.2%
Volatility (ann.)25.6%24.0%
Beta vs S&P 500-1.311.50
Max drawdown (3Y)-36.4%-25.7%
Dividend yield0.45%
Expense ratio0.08%
Assets under management$115.4B
Sector / categoryUS ListedSector ETF
Smaller drawdown: XLK -25.7% vs -36.4%Higher 5y return: XLK +145.2% vs -53.1%

On the fund side, XLK sits in the Technology category at State Street Investment Management, with $115.4B under management, 73 holdings, a 0.08% expense ratio, a 0.45% trailing dividend yield.

-16%0%+46%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). VXZ · XLK

Year-by-year returns

YearVXZXLK
2022+0.5%-27.7%
2023-44.0%+56.0%
2024-12.7%+21.6%
2025+5.7%+24.6%
2026-10.5%+31.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are VXZ and XLK good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.63, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between VXZ and XLK?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between VXZ and XLK is -0.63 over 3 years, -0.49 over 1 year and -0.61 over 5 years.

Is XLK a good diversifier for VXZ?

Yes: at -0.63, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.63 mean?

A reading of -0.63 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/vxz-vs-xlk.json

VXZ vs XLK: 3-year weekly correlation -0.63VXZ vs XLK-0.63

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![VXZ vs XLK correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/vxz-vs-xlk.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/vxz-vs-xlk/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: VXZ correlations · XLK correlations