PairBook
HomeVXZ › VXZ vs XLB

VXZ vs XLB: Correlation

How closely do iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) and Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLB) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.54, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.54
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.48
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.59
long-run
Ann. covariance
-229.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are VXZ and XLB?

Over the past 3 years, VXZ and XLB moved with a correlation of -0.54, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.48 over 1 year against -0.54 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.59, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -229.4 %².

By 3-year correlation, XLB places #2649 of the 2840 assets tracked against VXZ. The last year tells two different stories: XLB led by 33.7 percentage points, -16.1% for VXZ against +17.6% for XLB. Note the risk asymmetry: VXZ runs 1.5 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

VXZ vs XLB: side by side

VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)XLB (Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund)
1-year return-16.1%+17.6%
5-year return-53.1%+36.9%
Volatility (ann.)25.6%16.7%
Beta vs S&P 500-1.310.72
Max drawdown (3Y)-36.4%-23.2%
Dividend yield1.68%
Expense ratio0.08%
Assets under management$8.3B
Sector / categoryUS ListedSector ETF
Smaller drawdown: XLB -23.2% vs -36.4%Higher 5y return: XLB +36.9% vs -53.1%

XLB is a Natural Resources fund from State Street Investment Management: $8.3B under management, 26 holdings, a 0.08% expense ratio, a 1.68% trailing dividend yield.

-16%0%+19%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). VXZ · XLB

Year-by-year returns

YearVXZXLB
2022+0.5%-12.3%
2023-44.0%+12.5%
2024-12.7%+0.1%
2025+5.7%+9.9%
2026-10.5%+18.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are VXZ and XLB good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.54, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between VXZ and XLB?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.54 over 3 years, with -0.48 over the last year and -0.59 over 5 years.

Is XLB a good diversifier for VXZ?

Yes: at -0.54, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.54 mean?

A reading of -0.54 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/vxz-vs-xlb.json

VXZ vs XLB: 3-year weekly correlation -0.54VXZ vs XLB-0.54

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![VXZ vs XLB correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/vxz-vs-xlb.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/vxz-vs-xlb/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: VXZ correlations · XLB correlations