VXZ vs WTS: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) and Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (WTS) carry a correlation of -0.47, a negative link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are VXZ and WTS?
On 3 years of weekly data the VXZ/WTS correlation comes out at -0.47, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.43 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.45, and annualized covariance runs at -295.2 %².
By 3-year correlation, WTS places #2396 of the 2840 assets tracked against VXZ. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with WTS ahead by 48.0 points (-16.1% versus +31.9%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
VXZ vs WTS: side by side
| VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN) | WTS (Watts Water Technologies, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -16.1% | +31.9% |
| 5-year return | -53.1% | +125.4% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 25.6% | 24.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -1.31 | 0.89 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -36.4% | -19.5% |
| Market cap | – | $12.4B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 32.5 |
| Dividend yield | – | 0.58% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | VXZ | WTS |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +0.5% | -24.1% |
| 2023 | -44.0% | +43.6% |
| 2024 | -12.7% | -1.6% |
| 2025 | +5.7% | +36.8% |
| 2026 | -10.5% | +35.4% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are VXZ and WTS good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.47 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between VXZ and WTS?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.47 over 3 years, with -0.43 over the last year and -0.45 over 5 years.
Is WTS a good diversifier for VXZ?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.47 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.47 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.47 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/vxz-vs-wts.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/vxz-vs-wts/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: VXZ correlations · WTS correlations
