PairBook
HomeVXZ › VXZ vs WT

VXZ vs WT: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) and WisdomTree, Inc. (WT) carry a correlation of -0.37, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.37
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.32
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.40
long-run
Ann. covariance
-319.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are VXZ and WT?

On 3 years of weekly data the VXZ/WT correlation comes out at -0.37, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.32) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.40, and annualized covariance runs at -319.9 %².

Within VXZ's tracked universe of 2840 assets, WT comes in at #1640 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months WT outperformed by 102.8 percentage points (-16.1% for VXZ against +86.7% for WT).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

VXZ vs WT: side by side

VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)WT (WisdomTree, Inc.)
1-year return-16.1%+86.7%
5-year return-53.1%+330.3%
Volatility (ann.)25.6%34.2%
Beta vs S&P 500-1.311.17
Max drawdown (3Y)-36.4%-36.9%
Market cap$3.8B
P/E (trailing)44.7
Dividend yield0.48%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -36.9%Higher 5y return: WT +330.3% vs -53.1%
-18%0%+88%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. VXZ · WT

Year-by-year returns

YearVXZWT
2022+0.5%-8.9%
2023-44.0%+29.6%
2024-12.7%+53.5%
2025+5.7%+17.4%
2026-10.5%+106.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are VXZ and WT good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.37 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between VXZ and WT?

The VXZ/WT correlation stands at -0.37 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.32, 5 years: -0.40), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is WT a good diversifier for VXZ?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.37 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.37 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.37 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/vxz-vs-wt.json

VXZ vs WT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.37VXZ vs WT-0.37

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![VXZ vs WT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/vxz-vs-wt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/vxz-vs-wt/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: VXZ correlations · WT correlations