PairBook
HomeVXZ › VXZ vs WSFS

VXZ vs WSFS: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) and WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) carry a correlation of -0.49, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.49
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.16
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.46
long-run
Ann. covariance
-372.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are VXZ and WSFS?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of VXZ and WSFS correlate at -0.49, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.16) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.49). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.46, with an annualized covariance of -372.6 %².

Within VXZ's tracked universe of 2840 assets, WSFS comes in at #2486 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months WSFS outperformed by 50.1 percentage points (-16.1% for VXZ against +34.0% for WSFS).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

VXZ vs WSFS: side by side

VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)WSFS (WSFS Financial Corporation)
1-year return-16.1%+34.0%
5-year return-53.1%+85.9%
Volatility (ann.)25.6%29.9%
Beta vs S&P 500-1.310.89
Max drawdown (3Y)-36.4%-24.7%
Market cap$4.0B
P/E (trailing)13.2
Dividend yield0.90%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: WSFS -24.7% vs -36.4%Higher 5y return: WSFS +85.9% vs -53.1%
-16%0%+42%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. VXZ · WSFS

Year-by-year returns

YearVXZWSFS
2022+0.5%-8.4%
2023-44.0%+2.9%
2024-12.7%+17.1%
2025+5.7%+5.2%
2026-10.5%+43.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are VXZ and WSFS good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.49, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between VXZ and WSFS?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.49 over 3 years, with -0.16 over the last year and -0.46 over 5 years.

Is WSFS a good diversifier for VXZ?

Yes: at -0.49, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.49 mean?

A reading of -0.49 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/vxz-vs-wsfs.json

VXZ vs WSFS: 3-year weekly correlation -0.49VXZ vs WSFS-0.49

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![VXZ vs WSFS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/vxz-vs-wsfs.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/vxz-vs-wsfs/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: VXZ correlations · WSFS correlations