PairBook
HomeVXZ › VXZ vs WSBF

VXZ vs WSBF: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) and Waterstone Financial, Inc. (WSBF) carry a correlation of -0.48, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.48
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.28
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.43
long-run
Ann. covariance
-325.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are VXZ and WSBF?

Over the past 3 years, VXZ and WSBF moved with a correlation of -0.48, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.28 versus -0.48 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.43, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -325.3 %².

Among the 2840 assets we track against VXZ, WSBF ranks #2442 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months WSBF outperformed by 66.0 percentage points (-16.1% for VXZ against +49.9% for WSBF).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

VXZ vs WSBF: side by side

VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)WSBF (Waterstone Financial, Inc.)
1-year return-16.1%+49.9%
5-year return-53.1%+33.3%
Volatility (ann.)25.6%26.2%
Beta vs S&P 500-1.310.61
Max drawdown (3Y)-36.4%-26.5%
Market cap$0.4B
P/E (trailing)12.1
Dividend yield3.05%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: WSBF -26.5% vs -36.4%Higher 5y return: WSBF +33.3% vs -53.1%
-16%0%+49%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. VXZ · WSBF

Year-by-year returns

YearVXZWSBF
2022+0.5%-15.8%
2023-44.0%-13.1%
2024-12.7%-0.9%
2025+5.7%+28.8%
2026-10.5%+30.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are VXZ and WSBF good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.48, VXZ and WSBF have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between VXZ and WSBF?

The VXZ/WSBF correlation stands at -0.48 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.28, 5 years: -0.43), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is WSBF a good diversifier for VXZ?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.48, VXZ and WSBF have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.48 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/vxz-vs-wsbf.json

VXZ vs WSBF: 3-year weekly correlation -0.48VXZ vs WSBF-0.48

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![VXZ vs WSBF correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/vxz-vs-wsbf.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/vxz-vs-wsbf/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: VXZ correlations · WSBF correlations