PairBook
HomeVXZ › VXZ vs WS

VXZ vs WS: Correlation

How closely do iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) and Worthington Steel, Inc. (WS) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.43, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.43
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.33
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-546.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are VXZ and WS?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of VXZ and WS correlate at -0.43, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.33 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -546.4 %².

By 3-year correlation, WS places #2148 of the 2840 assets tracked against VXZ. The last year tells two different stories: WS led by 20.9 percentage points, -16.1% for VXZ against +4.8% for WS. Risk is not evenly split, since WS carries 2.0 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

VXZ vs WS: side by side

VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)WS (Worthington Steel, Inc.)
1-year return-16.1%+4.8%
5-year return-53.1%n/a
Volatility (ann.)25.6%51.2%
Beta vs S&P 500-1.311.67
Max drawdown (3Y)-36.4%-51.0%
Market cap$1.7B
P/E (trailing)201.9
Dividend yield1.89%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -51.0%
-16%0%+46%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. VXZ · WS

Year-by-year returns

YearVXZWS
2022+0.5%
2023-44.0%
2024-12.7%+15.4%
2025+5.7%+11.2%
2026-10.5%-0.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are VXZ and WS good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.43 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between VXZ and WS?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between VXZ and WS is -0.43 over 3 years, -0.33 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is WS a good diversifier for VXZ?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.43 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.43 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/vxz-vs-ws.json

VXZ vs WS: 3-year weekly correlation -0.43VXZ vs WS-0.43

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![VXZ vs WS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/vxz-vs-ws.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/vxz-vs-ws/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: VXZ correlations · WS correlations