PairBook
HomeVFF › VFF vs VXZ

VFF vs VXZ: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Village Farms International, Inc. (VFF) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) carry a correlation of -0.27, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.27
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.16
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.25
long-run
Ann. covariance
-537.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are VFF and VXZ?

Over the past 3 years, VFF and VXZ moved with a correlation of -0.27, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.16) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.27). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.25, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -537.7 %².

Out of 13 assets tracked against VFF, VXZ lands near the bottom at #12. Over the last 12 months VFF came out ahead by 10.5 percentage points (-5.6% against -16.1%). Risk is not evenly split, since VFF carries 3.1 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

VFF vs VXZ: side by side

VFF (Village Farms International, Inc.)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return-5.6%-16.1%
5-year return-69.7%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)78.2%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.61-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-68.6%-36.4%
Market cap$0.3B
P/E (trailing)15.9
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -68.6%Higher 5y return: VXZ -53.1% vs -69.7%
-29%0%+53%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. VFF · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearVFFVXZ
2022-79.1%+0.5%
2023-43.2%-44.0%
2024+1.3%-12.7%
2025+373.4%+5.7%
2026-21.6%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are VFF and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.27 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between VFF and VXZ?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.27 over 3 years, with -0.16 over the last year and -0.25 over 5 years.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for VFF?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.27 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.27 mean?

A reading of -0.27 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/vff-vs-vxz.json

VFF vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.27VFF vs VXZ-0.27

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![VFF vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/vff-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/vff-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: VFF correlations · VXZ correlations