PairBook
HomeVBF › VBF vs VXZ

VBF vs VXZ: Correlation

How closely do Invesco Bond Fund (VBF) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.32, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.32
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.56
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.27
long-run
Ann. covariance
-74.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are VBF and VXZ?

On 3 years of weekly data the VBF/VXZ correlation comes out at -0.32, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.56) than the 3-year average (-0.32). The 5-year figure is -0.27, and annualized covariance runs at -74.3 %².

Among the 11 assets we track against VBF, VXZ sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #11. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months VBF outperformed by 16.8 percentage points (+0.7% for VBF against -16.1% for VXZ). Risk is not evenly split, since VXZ carries 2.8 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

VBF vs VXZ: side by side

VBF (Invesco Bond Fund)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+0.7%-16.1%
5-year return-4.4%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)9.2%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.19-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-11.5%-36.4%
Market cap$0.2B
P/E (trailing)14.4
Dividend yield5.72%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VBF -11.5% vs -36.4%Higher 5y return: VBF -4.4% vs -53.1%
-16%0%+9%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. VBF · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearVBFVXZ
2022-17.8%+0.5%
2023+2.3%-44.0%
2024+7.0%-12.7%
2025+5.5%+5.7%
2026-1.0%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are VBF and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.32 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between VBF and VXZ?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between VBF and VXZ is -0.32 over 3 years, -0.56 over 1 year and -0.27 over 5 years.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for VBF?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.32 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.32 mean?

A reading of -0.32 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/vbf-vs-vxz.json

VBF vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.32VBF vs VXZ-0.32

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![VBF vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/vbf-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/vbf-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: VBF correlations · VXZ correlations