PairBook
HomeUTZ › UTZ vs WLFC

UTZ vs WLFC: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Utz Brands Inc (UTZ) and Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) carry a correlation of -0.46, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.46
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.62
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.34
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1840.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are UTZ and WLFC?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of UTZ and WLFC correlate at -0.46, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.62) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.46). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.34, with an annualized covariance of -1840.3 %².

Among the 15 assets we track against UTZ, WLFC sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #15. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months UTZ outperformed by 71.6 percentage points (+8.3% for UTZ against -63.3% for WLFC).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

UTZ vs WLFC: side by side

UTZ (Utz Brands Inc)WLFC (Willis Lease Finance Corporation)
1-year return+8.3%-63.3%
5-year return-16.7%+47.2%
Volatility (ann.)65.9%61.3%
Beta vs S&P 5000.071.30
Max drawdown (3Y)-63.8%-77.4%
Market cap$2.0B$1.2B
P/E (trailing)13.8
Dividend yield2.62%0.88%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: UTZ 2.62% vs 0.88%Smaller drawdown: UTZ -63.8% vs -77.4%Higher 5y return: WLFC +47.2% vs -16.7%
-63%0%+52%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). UTZ · WLFC

Year-by-year returns

YearUTZWLFC
2022+0.9%+56.7%
2023+3.9%-17.2%
2024-2.1%+327.3%
2025-32.3%-34.5%
2026+39.2%-59.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are UTZ and WLFC good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.46, UTZ and WLFC have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between UTZ and WLFC?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between UTZ and WLFC is -0.46 over 3 years, -0.62 over 1 year and -0.34 over 5 years.

Is WLFC a good diversifier for UTZ?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.46, UTZ and WLFC have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.46 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/utz-vs-wlfc.json

UTZ vs WLFC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.46UTZ vs WLFC-0.46

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![UTZ vs WLFC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/utz-vs-wlfc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/utz-vs-wlfc/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: UTZ correlations · WLFC correlations