PairBook
HomeUTF › UTF vs VXZ

UTF vs VXZ: Correlation

Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.36.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.36
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.31
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.42
long-run
Ann. covariance
-160.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are UTF and VXZ?

Over the past 3 years, UTF and VXZ moved with a correlation of -0.36, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.31 over 1 year against -0.36 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.42, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -160.9 %².

Out of 19 assets tracked against UTF, VXZ lands near the bottom at #19. The last year tells two different stories: UTF led by 26.6 percentage points, +10.5% for UTF against -16.1% for VXZ.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

UTF vs VXZ: side by side

UTF (Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+10.5%-16.1%
5-year return+35.3%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)17.3%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.36-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-15.0%-36.4%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)6.9
Dividend yield6.81%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: UTF -15.0% vs -36.4%Higher 5y return: UTF +35.3% vs -53.1%
-16%0%+15%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. UTF · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearUTFVXZ
2022-9.7%+0.5%
2023-4.0%-44.0%
2024+22.2%-12.7%
2025+8.0%+5.7%
2026+18.5%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are UTF and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.36 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between UTF and VXZ?

The UTF/VXZ correlation stands at -0.36 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.31, 5 years: -0.42), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for UTF?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.36 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.36 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.36 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/utf-vs-vxz.json

UTF vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.36UTF vs VXZ-0.36

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![UTF vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/utf-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/utf-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: UTF correlations · VXZ correlations