PairBook
HomeULH › ULH vs VXZ

ULH vs VXZ: Correlation

Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. (ULH) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.34.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.34
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.18
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.33
long-run
Ann. covariance
-599.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ULH and VXZ?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of ULH and VXZ correlate at -0.34, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.18) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.34). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.33, with an annualized covariance of -599.1 %².

VXZ is close to the least connected end of ULH's tracked universe, ranking #15 of 15. Over the last 12 months VXZ came out ahead by 9.9 percentage points (-26.0% against -16.1%). One caveat on sizing: ULH is 2.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ULH vs VXZ: side by side

ULH (Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return-26.0%-16.1%
5-year return-5.6%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)68.3%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.46-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-76.1%-36.4%
Market cap$0.5B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield2.19%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -76.1%Higher 5y return: ULH -5.6% vs -53.1%
-48%0%+9%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. ULH · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearULHVXZ
2022+79.9%+0.5%
2023-14.9%-44.0%
2024+65.6%-12.7%
2025-66.3%+5.7%
2026+26.3%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ULH and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.34, ULH and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ULH and VXZ?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ULH and VXZ is -0.34 over 3 years, -0.18 over 1 year and -0.33 over 5 years.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for ULH?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.34, ULH and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.34 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.34 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ulh-vs-vxz.json

ULH vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.34ULH vs VXZ-0.34

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![ULH vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ulh-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ulh-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ULH correlations · VXZ correlations