PairBook
HomeUCIB › UCIB vs WHLR

UCIB vs WHLR: Correlation

ETRACS UBS Bloomberg Constant Maturity Commodity Index (UCIB) and Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (WHLR) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.22.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.14
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.15
long-run
Ann. covariance
-2088.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are UCIB and WHLR?

On 3 years of weekly data the UCIB/WHLR correlation comes out at -0.22, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.14 versus -0.22 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is -0.15, and annualized covariance runs at -2088.0 %².

WHLR is close to the least connected end of UCIB's tracked universe, ranking #9 of 11. The last year tells two different stories: UCIB led by 138.5 percentage points, +38.5% for UCIB against -100.0% for WHLR. Risk is not evenly split, since WHLR carries 30.8 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

UCIB vs WHLR: side by side

UCIB (ETRACS UBS Bloomberg Constant Maturity Commodity Index)WHLR (Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.)
1-year return+38.5%-100.0%
5-year return+88.1%-100.0%
Volatility (ann.)17.7%545.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.28-5.84
Max drawdown (3Y)-22.7%-100.0%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)0.0
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: UCIB -22.7% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: UCIB +88.1% vs -100.0%
-100%0%+39%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. UCIB · WHLR

Year-by-year returns

YearUCIBWHLR
2022+18.2%-28.0%
2023-2.3%-98.4%
2024+6.6%-98.4%
2025+9.0%-100.0%
2026+32.0%-99.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are UCIB and WHLR good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.22, UCIB and WHLR have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between UCIB and WHLR?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between UCIB and WHLR is -0.22 over 3 years, 0.14 over 1 year and -0.15 over 5 years.

Is WHLR a good diversifier for UCIB?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.22, UCIB and WHLR have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

A reading of -0.22 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ucib-vs-whlr.json

UCIB vs WHLR: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22UCIB vs WHLR-0.22

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![UCIB vs WHLR correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ucib-vs-whlr.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ucib-vs-whlr/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: UCIB correlations · WHLR correlations