PairBook
HomeTWIN › TWIN vs VXZ

TWIN vs VXZ: Correlation

Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.26.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.26
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.22
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.25
long-run
Ann. covariance
-342.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are TWIN and VXZ?

Over the past 3 years, TWIN and VXZ moved with a correlation of -0.26, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.22 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.25, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -342.3 %².

Out of 12 assets tracked against TWIN, VXZ lands near the bottom at #12. The last year tells two different stories: TWIN led by 102.3 percentage points, +86.2% for TWIN against -16.1% for VXZ. Note the risk asymmetry: TWIN runs 2.0 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

TWIN vs VXZ: side by side

TWIN (Twin Disc, Incorporated)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+86.2%-16.1%
5-year return+98.7%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)50.6%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.83-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-64.4%-36.4%
Market cap$0.3B
P/E (trailing)12.6
Dividend yield0.68%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -64.4%Higher 5y return: TWIN +98.7% vs -53.1%
-16%0%+90%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. TWIN · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearTWINVXZ
2022-11.3%+0.5%
2023+66.7%-44.0%
2024-26.4%-12.7%
2025+44.4%+5.7%
2026+41.0%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are TWIN and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.26, TWIN and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between TWIN and VXZ?

The TWIN/VXZ correlation stands at -0.26 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.22, 5 years: -0.25), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for TWIN?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.26, TWIN and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.26 mean?

A reading of -0.26 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/twin-vs-vxz.json

TWIN vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.26TWIN vs VXZ-0.26

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![TWIN vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/twin-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/twin-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: TWIN correlations · VXZ correlations