PairBook
HomeTRT › TRT vs WFCF

TRT vs WFCF: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Trio-Tech International (TRT) and Where Food Comes From, Inc. (WFCF) carry a correlation of -0.34, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.34
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.43
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.17
long-run
Ann. covariance
-2101.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are TRT and WFCF?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of TRT and WFCF correlate at -0.34, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.43 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.17, with an annualized covariance of -2101.1 %².

Among the 104 assets we track against TRT, WFCF sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #102. The last year tells two different stories: TRT led by 285.1 percentage points, +295.5% for TRT against +10.4% for WFCF. Risk is not evenly split, since TRT carries 1.9 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

TRT vs WFCF: side by side

TRT (Trio-Tech International)WFCF (Where Food Comes From, Inc.)
1-year return+295.5%+10.4%
5-year return+365.8%+0.4%
Volatility (ann.)107.4%57.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.180.27
Max drawdown (3Y)-54.6%-49.1%
Market cap$0.1B
P/E (trailing)209.645.7
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: WFCF 45.7 vs 209.6Smaller drawdown: WFCF -49.1% vs -54.6%Higher 5y return: TRT +365.8% vs +0.4%
-25%0%+647%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). TRT · WFCF

Year-by-year returns

YearTRTWFCF
2022-66.5%-3.7%
2023+12.7%-3.0%
2024+14.6%-2.3%
2025+127.9%-13.2%
2026+58.3%+15.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are TRT and WFCF good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.34, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between TRT and WFCF?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.34 over 3 years, with -0.43 over the last year and -0.17 over 5 years.

Is WFCF a good diversifier for TRT?

Yes: at -0.34, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.34 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.34 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/trt-vs-wfcf.json

TRT vs WFCF: 3-year weekly correlation -0.34TRT vs WFCF-0.34

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![TRT vs WFCF correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/trt-vs-wfcf.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/trt-vs-wfcf/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: TRT correlations · WFCF correlations