TRAW vs VITL: Correlation
How closely do Traws Pharma, Inc. (TRAW) and Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.19, which is negative.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are TRAW and VITL?
Over the past 3 years, TRAW and VITL moved with a correlation of -0.19, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.27 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.12, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -1486.6 %².
Among the 16 assets we track against TRAW, VITL sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #15. The last year tells two different stories: TRAW led by 21.3 percentage points, -58.8% for TRAW against -80.1% for VITL. Risk is not evenly split, since TRAW carries 2.4 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
TRAW vs VITL: side by side
| TRAW (Traws Pharma, Inc.) | VITL (Vital Farms, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -58.8% | -80.1% |
| 5-year return | -99.5% | -39.5% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 138.3% | 57.5% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.67 | 0.55 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -98.3% | -84.2% |
| Market cap | – | $0.4B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | TRAW | VITL |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -74.5% | -17.4% |
| 2023 | +15.4% | +5.2% |
| 2024 | -52.6% | +140.2% |
| 2025 | -87.3% | -15.3% |
| 2026 | -48.2% | -67.3% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are TRAW and VITL good diversifiers for each other?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.19, TRAW and VITL have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
FAQ
What is the correlation between TRAW and VITL?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.19 over 3 years, with -0.27 over the last year and -0.12 over 5 years.
Is VITL a good diversifier for TRAW?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.19, TRAW and VITL have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.19 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/traw-vs-vitl.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/traw-vs-vitl/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: TRAW correlations · VITL correlations
