PairBook
HomeTMQ › TMQ vs VZ

TMQ vs VZ: Correlation

How closely do Trilogy Metals Inc. (TMQ) and Verizon (VZ) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.20, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.32
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.12
long-run
Ann. covariance
-616.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are TMQ and VZ?

Over the past 3 years, TMQ and VZ moved with a correlation of -0.20, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.32) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.20). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.12, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -616.2 %².

Among the 23 assets we track against TMQ, VZ sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #19. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months TMQ outperformed by 107.0 percentage points (+126.3% for TMQ against +19.3% for VZ). Risk is not evenly split, since TMQ carries 5.7 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

TMQ vs VZ: side by side

TMQ (Trilogy Metals Inc.)VZ (Verizon)
1-year return+126.3%+19.3%
5-year return+85.3%+23.8%
Volatility (ann.)131.6%22.9%
Beta vs S&P 5000.280.15
Max drawdown (3Y)-72.5%-17.0%
Market cap$0.7B$205.4B
P/E (trailing)12.9
Dividend yield0.00%5.57%
Sector / categoryUS ListedCommunication Services
Higher yield: VZ 5.57% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: VZ -17.0% vs -72.5%Higher 5y return: TMQ +85.3% vs +23.8%
-11%0%+251%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). TMQ · VZ

Year-by-year returns

YearTMQVZ
2022-66.7%-20.0%
2023-21.8%+2.7%
2024+169.8%+13.1%
2025+271.6%+8.9%
2026-12.3%+27.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are TMQ and VZ good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between TMQ and VZ?

The TMQ/VZ correlation stands at -0.20 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.32, 5 years: -0.12), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VZ a good diversifier for TMQ?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.20 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/tmq-vs-vz.json

TMQ vs VZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20TMQ vs VZ-0.20

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![TMQ vs VZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/tmq-vs-vz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/tmq-vs-vz/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: TMQ correlations · VZ correlations