TFC vs VXZ: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Truist Financial (TFC) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) carry a correlation of -0.57, a negative link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are TFC and VXZ?
Over the past 3 years, TFC and VXZ moved with a correlation of -0.57, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (-0.43) than the 3-year average (-0.57). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.57, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -408.4 %².
Out of 39 assets tracked against TFC, VXZ lands near the bottom at #39. The last year tells two different stories: TFC led by 28.2 percentage points, +12.1% for TFC against -16.1% for VXZ.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
TFC vs VXZ: side by side
| TFC (Truist Financial) | VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +12.1% | -16.1% |
| 5-year return | +12.7% | -53.1% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 28.0% | 25.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.07 | -1.31 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -26.9% | -36.4% |
| Market cap | $61.4B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 11.6 | – |
| Dividend yield | 4.10% | – |
| Sector / category | Financials | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | TFC | VXZ |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -23.5% | +0.5% |
| 2023 | -8.6% | -44.0% |
| 2024 | +23.7% | -12.7% |
| 2025 | +19.0% | +5.7% |
| 2026 | +5.4% | -10.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are TFC and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.57, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between TFC and VXZ?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.57 over 3 years, with -0.43 over the last year and -0.57 over 5 years.
Is VXZ a good diversifier for TFC?
Yes: at -0.57, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.57 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/tfc-vs-vxz.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/tfc-vs-vxz/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: TFC correlations · VXZ correlations
