TEL vs VT: Correlation
TE Connectivity (TEL) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) show a strong relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.71.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are TEL and VT?
Over the past 3 years, TEL and VT moved with a correlation of 0.71, which is strong. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.61 over 1 year against 0.71 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.74, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 283.0 %².
Few assets follow TEL as closely as VT, which ranks #2 of 36 tracked partners. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with VT ahead by 23.8 points (-1.1% versus +22.7%). On a rolling one-year basis the correlation drifted between 0.54 and 0.87, a moderate band. Note the risk asymmetry: TEL runs 2.1 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
TEL vs VT: side by side
| TEL (TE Connectivity) | VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -1.1% | +22.7% |
| 5-year return | +43.7% | +67.7% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 28.8% | 13.9% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.32 | 0.92 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -22.6% | -16.5% |
| Market cap | $58.8B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 20.1 | – |
| Dividend yield | 1.42% | 1.59% |
| Expense ratio | – | 0.06% |
| Assets under management | – | $97.9B |
| Sector / category | Information Technology | ETF · Global |
VT is a Global Large-Stock Blend fund from Vanguard: $97.9B under management, 5308 holdings, a 0.06% expense ratio, a 1.59% trailing dividend yield.
Year-by-year returns
| Year | TEL | VT |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -27.7% | -18.0% |
| 2023 | +24.6% | +22.0% |
| 2024 | +3.5% | +16.5% |
| 2025 | +61.1% | +22.4% |
| 2026 | -9.8% | +15.2% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Fund exposure
A structural note: 0.06% of VT is TEL itself, so the fund partly moves with the stock by construction.
Are TEL and VT good diversifiers for each other?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.71 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
FAQ
What is the correlation between TEL and VT?
The TEL/VT correlation stands at 0.71 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.61, 5 years: 0.74), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is VT a good diversifier for TEL?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.71 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
What does a correlation of 0.71 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/tel-vs-vt.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/tel-vs-vt/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: TEL correlations · VT correlations
