PairBook
HomeTECH › TECH vs XLV

TECH vs XLV: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Bio-Techne (TECH) and Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV) carry a correlation of 0.58, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.58
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.64
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.61
long-run
Ann. covariance
359.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are TECH and XLV?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of TECH and XLV correlate at 0.58, moderate. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.64) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.61, with an annualized covariance of 359.3 %².

By 3-year correlation, XLV places #10 of the 39 assets tracked against TECH. Twelve-month performance is nearly a tie, at +29.6% for TECH and +27.5% for XLV. On a rolling one-year basis the correlation drifted between 0.33 and 0.76, a moderate band. Risk is not evenly split, since TECH carries 2.9 times the volatility of the other side.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
One-year correlation, rolled weekly across the last three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

TECH vs XLV: side by side

TECH (Bio-Techne)XLV (Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund)
1-year return+29.6%+27.5%
5-year return-41.4%+37.4%
Volatility (ann.)41.9%14.7%
Beta vs S&P 5000.900.42
Max drawdown (3Y)-48.1%-17.1%
Market cap$11.4B
P/E (trailing)62.5
Dividend yield0.44%1.56%
Expense ratio0.08%
Assets under management$41.7B
Sector / categoryHealth CareSector ETF
Higher yield: XLV 1.56% vs 0.44%Smaller drawdown: XLV -17.1% vs -48.1%Higher 5y return: XLV +37.4% vs -41.4%

On the fund side, XLV sits in the Health category at State Street Investment Management, with $41.7B under management, 61 holdings, a 0.08% expense ratio, a 1.56% trailing dividend yield.

-20%0%+34%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. TECH · XLV

Year-by-year returns

YearTECHXLV
2022-35.7%-2.1%
2023-6.5%+2.1%
2024-6.2%+2.5%
2025-17.9%+14.5%
2026+23.8%+11.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Fund exposure

TECH represents 0.18% of XLV's portfolio, so part of any move in XLV is TECH itself, and the correlation between them is partly mechanical.

Are TECH and XLV good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.58 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between TECH and XLV?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between TECH and XLV is 0.58 over 3 years, 0.64 over 1 year and 0.61 over 5 years.

Is XLV a good diversifier for TECH?

To a limited degree. At 0.58 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.58 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/tech-vs-xlv.json

TECH vs XLV: 3-year weekly correlation 0.58TECH vs XLV0.58

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![TECH vs XLV correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/tech-vs-xlv.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/tech-vs-xlv/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: TECH correlations · XLV correlations