PairBook
HomeSO › SO vs XLK

SO vs XLK: Correlation

Southern Company (SO) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.20.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.29
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.05
long-run
Ann. covariance
-77.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are SO and XLK?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of SO and XLK correlate at -0.20, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.29 over 1 year against -0.20 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.05, with an annualized covariance of -77.6 %².

Within SO's tracked universe of 48 assets, XLK comes in at #33 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: XLK led by 44.8 percentage points, -1.4% for SO against +43.4% for XLK. The relationship is regime-dependent: the rolling one-year correlation swung between -0.35 and 0.27 over the past three years, so this pair behaves very differently depending on the market environment.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
How the one-year correlation itself moved over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

SO vs XLK: side by side

SO (Southern Company)XLK (Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund)
1-year return-1.4%+43.4%
5-year return+62.6%+145.2%
Volatility (ann.)16.5%24.0%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.021.50
Max drawdown (3Y)-15.0%-25.7%
Market cap$102.4B
P/E (trailing)21.7
Dividend yield3.32%0.45%
Expense ratio0.08%
Assets under management$115.4B
Sector / categoryUtilitiesSector ETF
Higher yield: SO 3.32% vs 0.45%Smaller drawdown: SO -15.0% vs -25.7%Higher 5y return: XLK +145.2% vs +62.6%

On the fund side, XLK sits in the Technology category at State Street Investment Management, with $115.4B under management, 73 holdings, a 0.08% expense ratio, a 0.45% trailing dividend yield.

-7%0%+46%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). SO · XLK

Year-by-year returns

YearSOXLK
2022+8.2%-27.7%
2023+2.2%+56.0%
2024+21.7%+21.6%
2025+9.5%+24.6%
2026+4.6%+31.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are SO and XLK good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between SO and XLK?

The SO/XLK correlation stands at -0.20 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.29, 5 years: 0.05), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is XLK a good diversifier for SO?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

A reading of -0.20 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/so-vs-xlk.json

SO vs XLK: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20SO vs XLK-0.20

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![SO vs XLK correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/so-vs-xlk.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/so-vs-xlk/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: SO correlations · XLK correlations