SNAL vs WFCF: Correlation
How closely do Snail, Inc. (SNAL) and Where Food Comes From, Inc. (WFCF) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.26, which is negative.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are SNAL and WFCF?
Over the past 3 years, SNAL and WFCF moved with a correlation of -0.26, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.39 versus -0.26 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.24, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -2155.4 %².
Out of 13 assets tracked against SNAL, WFCF lands near the bottom at #13. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with WFCF ahead by 45.6 points (-35.2% versus +10.4%). Note the risk asymmetry: SNAL runs 2.6 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
SNAL vs WFCF: side by side
| SNAL (Snail, Inc.) | WFCF (Where Food Comes From, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -35.2% | +10.4% |
| 5-year return | n/a | +0.4% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 146.7% | 57.1% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 2.22 | 0.27 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -88.0% | -49.1% |
| Market cap | – | $0.1B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 45.7 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | SNAL | WFCF |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | – | -3.7% |
| 2023 | -17.7% | -3.0% |
| 2024 | +53.7% | -2.3% |
| 2025 | -52.2% | -13.2% |
| 2026 | -33.6% | +15.3% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are SNAL and WFCF good diversifiers for each other?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.26, SNAL and WFCF have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
FAQ
What is the correlation between SNAL and WFCF?
The SNAL/WFCF correlation stands at -0.26 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.39, 5 years: -0.24), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is WFCF a good diversifier for SNAL?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.26, SNAL and WFCF have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
What does a correlation of -0.26 mean?
A reading of -0.26 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/snal-vs-wfcf.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/snal-vs-wfcf/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: SNAL correlations · WFCF correlations
