PairBook
HomeSNA › SNA vs YHGJ

SNA vs YHGJ: Correlation

Snap-on (SNA) and Yunhong Green CTI Ltd. (YHGJ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.19.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.19
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.41
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.11
long-run
Ann. covariance
-372.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are SNA and YHGJ?

On 3 years of weekly data the SNA/YHGJ correlation comes out at -0.19, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.41) than the 3-year average (-0.19). The 5-year figure is -0.11, and annualized covariance runs at -372.5 %².

By 3-year correlation, YHGJ places #25 of the 34 assets tracked against SNA. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with SNA ahead by 68.0 points (+23.1% versus -44.9%). One caveat on sizing: YHGJ is 4.2 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

SNA vs YHGJ: side by side

SNA (Snap-on)YHGJ (Yunhong Green CTI Ltd.)
1-year return+23.1%-44.9%
5-year return+99.6%-85.6%
Volatility (ann.)21.3%90.5%
Beta vs S&P 5000.70-0.69
Max drawdown (3Y)-20.8%-91.7%
Market cap$20.5B
P/E (trailing)20.2
Dividend yield2.38%0.00%
Sector / categoryIndustrialsUS Listed
Higher yield: SNA 2.38% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: SNA -20.8% vs -91.7%Higher 5y return: SNA +99.6% vs -85.6%
-56%0%+64%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. SNA · YHGJ

Year-by-year returns

YearSNAYHGJ
2022+8.9%-12.6%
2023+29.7%+105.8%
2024+20.7%-74.3%
2025+4.3%-34.0%
2026+17.1%-19.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are SNA and YHGJ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.19, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between SNA and YHGJ?

The SNA/YHGJ correlation stands at -0.19 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.41, 5 years: -0.11), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is YHGJ a good diversifier for SNA?

Yes: at -0.19, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.19 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/sna-vs-yhgj.json

SNA vs YHGJ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.19SNA vs YHGJ-0.19

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![SNA vs YHGJ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/sna-vs-yhgj.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/sna-vs-yhgj/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: SNA correlations · YHGJ correlations