PairBook
HomeSMR › SMR vs VXZ

SMR vs VXZ: Correlation

NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.24.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.24
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.25
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.23
long-run
Ann. covariance
-739.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are SMR and VXZ?

On 3 years of weekly data the SMR/VXZ correlation comes out at -0.24, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.25) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.23, and annualized covariance runs at -739.0 %².

Out of 14 assets tracked against SMR, VXZ lands near the bottom at #12. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with VXZ ahead by 56.2 points (-72.3% versus -16.1%). One caveat on sizing: SMR is 4.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

SMR vs VXZ: side by side

SMR (NuScale Power Corporation)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return-72.3%-16.1%
5-year return-3.2%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)119.8%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5003.28-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-85.8%-36.4%
Market cap$4.0B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -85.8%Higher 5y return: SMR -3.2% vs -53.1%
-78%0%+35%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. SMR · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearSMRVXZ
2022+0.5%
2023-67.9%-44.0%
2024+445.0%-12.7%
2025-21.0%+5.7%
2026-31.3%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are SMR and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.24, SMR and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between SMR and VXZ?

The SMR/VXZ correlation stands at -0.24 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.25, 5 years: -0.23), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for SMR?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.24, SMR and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/smr-vs-vxz.json

SMR vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.24SMR vs VXZ-0.24

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![SMR vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/smr-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/smr-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: SMR correlations · VXZ correlations