PairBook
HomeSLG › SLG vs VXZ

SLG vs VXZ: Correlation

SL Green Realty Corp (SLG) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.47.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.47
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.38
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.50
long-run
Ann. covariance
-499.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are SLG and VXZ?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of SLG and VXZ correlate at -0.47, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.38 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.50, with an annualized covariance of -499.2 %².

Out of 14 assets tracked against SLG, VXZ lands near the bottom at #14. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months SLG outperformed by 22.8 percentage points (+6.7% for SLG against -16.1% for VXZ). Note the risk asymmetry: SLG runs 1.6 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

SLG vs VXZ: side by side

SLG (SL Green Realty Corp)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+6.7%-16.1%
5-year return+15.1%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)41.1%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.33-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-53.9%-36.4%
Market cap$4.4B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield5.65%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -53.9%Higher 5y return: SLG +15.1% vs -53.1%
-42%0%+9%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. SLG · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearSLGVXZ
2022-50.9%+0.5%
2023+48.8%-44.0%
2024+58.3%-12.7%
2025-29.0%+5.7%
2026+29.8%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are SLG and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.47, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between SLG and VXZ?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between SLG and VXZ is -0.47 over 3 years, -0.38 over 1 year and -0.50 over 5 years.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for SLG?

Yes: at -0.47, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.47 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.47 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/slg-vs-vxz.json

SLG vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.47SLG vs VXZ-0.47

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![SLG vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/slg-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/slg-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: SLG correlations · VXZ correlations