PairBook
HomeSJM › SJM vs ZCMD

SJM vs ZCMD: Correlation

How closely do J.M. Smucker Company (The) (SJM) and Zhongchao Inc. - Class A (ZCMD) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.20, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.24
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.16
long-run
Ann. covariance
-753.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are SJM and ZCMD?

Over the past 3 years, SJM and ZCMD moved with a correlation of -0.20, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.24 over 1 year against -0.20 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.16, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -753.4 %².

Within SJM's tracked universe of 33 assets, ZCMD comes in at #25 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with SJM ahead by 129.8 points (+29.9% versus -99.9%). Risk is not evenly split, since ZCMD carries 5.5 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

SJM vs ZCMD: side by side

SJM (J.M. Smucker Company (The))ZCMD (Zhongchao Inc. - Class A)
1-year return+29.9%-99.9%
5-year return+28.2%-100.0%
Volatility (ann.)26.0%141.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.210.59
Max drawdown (3Y)-32.5%-100.0%
Market cap$14.1B
P/E (trailing)61.3
Dividend yield3.38%0.00%
Sector / categoryConsumer StaplesUS Listed
Higher yield: SJM 3.38% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: SJM -32.5% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: SJM +28.2% vs -100.0%
-100%0%+32%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). SJM · ZCMD

Year-by-year returns

YearSJMZCMD
2022+20.1%-35.4%
2023-17.8%-69.5%
2024-9.6%-53.8%
2025-7.6%-72.2%
2026+38.9%-99.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are SJM and ZCMD good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between SJM and ZCMD?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between SJM and ZCMD is -0.20 over 3 years, -0.24 over 1 year and -0.16 over 5 years.

Is ZCMD a good diversifier for SJM?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.20 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/sjm-vs-zcmd.json

SJM vs ZCMD: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20SJM vs ZCMD-0.20

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![SJM vs ZCMD correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/sjm-vs-zcmd.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/sjm-vs-zcmd/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: SJM correlations · ZCMD correlations