PairBook
HomeSITM › SITM vs SMH

SITM vs SMH: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, SiTime Corporation (SITM) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) carry a correlation of 0.67, a strong link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.67
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.70
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.68
long-run
Ann. covariance
1750.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are SITM and SMH?

Over the past 3 years, SITM and SMH moved with a correlation of 0.67, which is strong. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.70) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.68, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 1750.4 %².

SMH is one of the assets that tracks SITM most closely: it ranks #3 out of the 13 assets we track against SITM. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with SITM ahead by 58.2 points (+151.3% versus +93.1%). Note the risk asymmetry: SITM runs 2.3 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

SITM vs SMH: side by side

SITM (SiTime Corporation)SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF)
1-year return+151.3%+93.1%
5-year return+183.2%+332.8%
Volatility (ann.)77.7%33.7%
Beta vs S&P 5002.971.91
Max drawdown (3Y)-55.3%-35.7%
Market cap$18.0B
P/E (trailing)999.8
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedETF · Thematic
Smaller drawdown: SMH -35.7% vs -55.3%Higher 5y return: SMH +332.8% vs +183.2%
0%+255%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. SITM · SMH

Year-by-year returns

YearSITMSMH
2022-65.3%-33.5%
2023+20.1%+73.4%
2024+75.7%+39.1%
2025+64.6%+49.2%
2026+69.8%+59.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are SITM and SMH good diversifiers for each other?

Somewhat, no more. With 0.67 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.

FAQ

What is the correlation between SITM and SMH?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.67 over 3 years, with 0.70 over the last year and 0.68 over 5 years.

Is SMH a good diversifier for SITM?

Somewhat, no more. With 0.67 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.

What does a correlation of 0.67 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/sitm-vs-smh.json

SITM vs SMH: 3-year weekly correlation 0.67SITM vs SMH0.67

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![SITM vs SMH correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/sitm-vs-smh.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/sitm-vs-smh/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: SITM correlations · SMH correlations