SGU vs SNTG: Correlation
Star Group L.P. (SGU) and Sentage Holdings Inc. - Class A (SNTG) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.26.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are SGU and SNTG?
On 3 years of weekly data the SGU/SNTG correlation comes out at -0.26, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.07) than the 3-year average (-0.26). The 5-year figure is -0.15, and annualized covariance runs at -746.6 %².
Out of 11 assets tracked against SGU, SNTG lands near the bottom at #9. Over the last 12 months SGU came out ahead by 6.7 percentage points (+14.6% against +7.9%). Risk is not evenly split, since SNTG carries 5.6 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
SGU vs SNTG: side by side
| SGU (Star Group L.P.) | SNTG (Sentage Holdings Inc. - Class A) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +14.6% | +7.9% |
| 5-year return | +58.3% | -93.0% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 22.6% | 126.7% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.18 | 1.13 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -27.1% | -76.2% |
| Market cap | $0.4B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 5.6 | – |
| Dividend yield | 6.09% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | SGU | SNTG |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +18.9% | -68.8% |
| 2023 | +0.7% | +160.4% |
| 2024 | +6.3% | -63.8% |
| 2025 | +9.0% | +4.4% |
| 2026 | +11.5% | -5.8% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are SGU and SNTG good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.26 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between SGU and SNTG?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.26 over 3 years, with 0.07 over the last year and -0.15 over 5 years.
Is SNTG a good diversifier for SGU?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.26 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.26 mean?
A reading of -0.26 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/sgu-vs-sntg.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/sgu-vs-sntg/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: SGU correlations · SNTG correlations
