SER vs VTR: Correlation
Serina Therapeutics, Inc. (SER) and Ventas (VTR) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.23.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are SER and VTR?
Over the past 3 years, SER and VTR moved with a correlation of -0.23, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.30 over 1 year against -0.23 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.05, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -493.3 %².
VTR is close to the least connected end of SER's tracked universe, ranking #19 of 22. The last year tells two different stories: VTR led by 89.9 percentage points, -49.5% for SER against +40.4% for VTR. Note the risk asymmetry: SER runs 4.6 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
SER vs VTR: side by side
| SER (Serina Therapeutics, Inc.) | VTR (Ventas) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -49.5% | +40.4% |
| 5-year return | -93.1% | +98.1% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 98.4% | 21.5% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -0.30 | 0.25 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -95.5% | -16.7% |
| Market cap | $0.1B | $47.6B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 168.9 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.14% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Real Estate |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | SER | VTR |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -49.4% | -8.5% |
| 2023 | -30.3% | +15.1% |
| 2024 | -63.6% | +22.2% |
| 2025 | -61.8% | +35.1% |
| 2026 | +31.7% | +21.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are SER and VTR good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.23 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between SER and VTR?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.23 over 3 years, with -0.30 over the last year and -0.05 over 5 years.
Is VTR a good diversifier for SER?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.23 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.23 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ser-vs-vtr.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ser-vs-vtr/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: SER correlations · VTR correlations
