SER vs TULP: Correlation
Serina Therapeutics, Inc. (SER) and Bloomia Holdings, Inc. (TULP) show a weak relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.25.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are SER and TULP?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of SER and TULP correlate at 0.25, weak. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.19 over 1 year against 0.25 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.17, with an annualized covariance of 1315.4 %².
By 3-year correlation, TULP places #6 of the 22 assets tracked against SER. The trailing year gives TULP the advantage: -49.5% versus -40.4%, a 9.1-point spread. One caveat on sizing: SER is 1.9 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
SER vs TULP: side by side
| SER (Serina Therapeutics, Inc.) | TULP (Bloomia Holdings, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -49.5% | -40.4% |
| 5-year return | -93.1% | -59.8% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 98.4% | 52.9% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -0.30 | 0.08 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -95.5% | -53.2% |
| Market cap | $0.1B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | SER | TULP |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -49.4% | -66.2% |
| 2023 | -30.3% | -41.0% |
| 2024 | -63.6% | +5.2% |
| 2025 | -61.8% | -28.9% |
| 2026 | +31.7% | -1.4% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are SER and TULP good diversifiers for each other?
A fair diversifier. At 0.25, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
FAQ
What is the correlation between SER and TULP?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between SER and TULP is 0.25 over 3 years, 0.19 over 1 year and 0.17 over 5 years.
Is TULP a good diversifier for SER?
A fair diversifier. At 0.25, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
What does a correlation of 0.25 mean?
A reading of 0.25 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ser-vs-tulp.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ser-vs-tulp/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: SER correlations · TULP correlations
