SBCF vs WD: Correlation
Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (SBCF) and Walker & Dunlop, Inc (WD) show a strong relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.68.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are SBCF and WD?
On 3 years of weekly data the SBCF/WD correlation comes out at 0.68, strong. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.56) runs below the 3-year figure (0.68). The 5-year figure is 0.61, and annualized covariance runs at 808.6 %².
Among the 30 assets we track against SBCF, WD ranks #17 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: SBCF led by 63.7 percentage points, +12.7% for SBCF against -51.0% for WD.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
SBCF vs WD: side by side
| SBCF (Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida) | WD (Walker & Dunlop, Inc) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +12.7% | -51.0% |
| 5-year return | +23.0% | -53.5% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 30.8% | 38.5% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.96 | 1.12 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -27.8% | -63.4% |
| Market cap | $3.3B | $1.4B |
| P/E (trailing) | 22.3 | 36.0 |
| Dividend yield | 2.18% | 6.70% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | SBCF | WD |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -10.1% | -46.8% |
| 2023 | -6.0% | +46.0% |
| 2024 | -0.5% | -10.1% |
| 2025 | +17.1% | -35.9% |
| 2026 | +10.5% | -29.9% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are SBCF and WD good diversifiers for each other?
To a limited degree. At 0.68 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.
FAQ
What is the correlation between SBCF and WD?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between SBCF and WD is 0.68 over 3 years, 0.56 over 1 year and 0.61 over 5 years.
Is WD a good diversifier for SBCF?
To a limited degree. At 0.68 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.
What does a correlation of 0.68 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.68 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/sbcf-vs-wd.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/sbcf-vs-wd/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: SBCF correlations · WD correlations
