RSKD vs STIM: Correlation
Riskified Ltd. Class A (RSKD) and Neuronetics, Inc. (STIM) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.39.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are RSKD and STIM?
On 3 years of weekly data the RSKD/STIM correlation comes out at 0.39, moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.40 over 1 year against 0.39 over 3. The 5-year figure is 0.34, and annualized covariance runs at 1615.5 %².
By 3-year correlation, STIM places #8 of the 17 assets tracked against RSKD. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with RSKD ahead by 43.5 points (+31.6% versus -11.9%). Risk is not evenly split, since STIM carries 2.9 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
RSKD vs STIM: side by side
| RSKD (Riskified Ltd. Class A) | STIM (Neuronetics, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +31.6% | -11.9% |
| 5-year return | -81.3% | -54.7% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 38.0% | 109.2% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.09 | 1.83 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -42.2% | -87.3% |
| Market cap | $0.8B | $0.2B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | RSKD | STIM |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -41.2% | +54.0% |
| 2023 | +1.3% | -57.8% |
| 2024 | +1.1% | -44.5% |
| 2025 | +5.1% | -14.3% |
| 2026 | +23.1% | +114.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are RSKD and STIM good diversifiers for each other?
A fair diversifier. At 0.39, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
FAQ
What is the correlation between RSKD and STIM?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between RSKD and STIM is 0.39 over 3 years, 0.40 over 1 year and 0.34 over 5 years.
Is STIM a good diversifier for RSKD?
A fair diversifier. At 0.39, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
What does a correlation of 0.39 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.39 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/rskd-vs-stim.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/rskd-vs-stim/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: RSKD correlations · STIM correlations
