PairBook
HomeRMTI › RMTI vs VXZ

RMTI vs VXZ: Correlation

Rockwell Medical, Inc. (RMTI) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.31.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.31
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.25
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.30
long-run
Ann. covariance
-625.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are RMTI and VXZ?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of RMTI and VXZ correlate at -0.31, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.25 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.30, with an annualized covariance of -625.3 %².

Among the 11 assets we track against RMTI, VXZ sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #10. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with VXZ ahead by 31.2 points (-47.3% versus -16.1%). Note the risk asymmetry: RMTI runs 3.1 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

RMTI vs VXZ: side by side

RMTI (Rockwell Medical, Inc.)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return-47.3%-16.1%
5-year return-89.3%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)79.9%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.63-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-88.8%-36.4%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -88.8%Higher 5y return: VXZ -53.1% vs -89.3%
-66%0%+9%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. RMTI · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearRMTIVXZ
2022-77.6%+0.5%
2023+87.1%-44.0%
2024+7.9%-12.7%
2025-59.3%+5.7%
2026-6.6%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are RMTI and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.31, RMTI and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between RMTI and VXZ?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between RMTI and VXZ is -0.31 over 3 years, -0.25 over 1 year and -0.30 over 5 years.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for RMTI?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.31, RMTI and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.31 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.31 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/rmti-vs-vxz.json

RMTI vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.31RMTI vs VXZ-0.31

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![RMTI vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/rmti-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/rmti-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: RMTI correlations · VXZ correlations