PairBook
HomeRMT › RMT vs TEAD

RMT vs TEAD: Correlation

Royce Micro-Cap Trust, Inc. (RMT) and Te (TEAD) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.40.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.40
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.45
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.40
long-run
Ann. covariance
591.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are RMT and TEAD?

Over the past 3 years, RMT and TEAD moved with a correlation of 0.40, which is moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.45 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.40, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 591.3 %².

Among the 136 assets we track against RMT, TEAD ranks #127 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months RMT outperformed by 122.0 percentage points (+48.4% for RMT against -73.6% for TEAD). Note the risk asymmetry: TEAD runs 3.5 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

RMT vs TEAD: side by side

RMT (Royce Micro-Cap Trust, Inc.)TEAD (Te)
1-year return+48.4%-73.6%
5-year return+80.1%-97.2%
Volatility (ann.)20.5%71.3%
Beta vs S&P 5001.091.33
Max drawdown (3Y)-26.4%-93.8%
Market cap$0.8B
P/E (trailing)8.5
Dividend yield5.57%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: RMT 5.57% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: RMT -26.4% vs -93.8%Higher 5y return: RMT +80.1% vs -97.2%
-71%0%+52%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. RMT · TEAD

Year-by-year returns

YearRMTTEAD
2022-16.8%-74.1%
2023+15.8%+21.0%
2024+14.0%+63.9%
2025+16.1%-90.2%
2026+39.6%-33.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are RMT and TEAD good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.40, RMT and TEAD keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between RMT and TEAD?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between RMT and TEAD is 0.40 over 3 years, 0.45 over 1 year and 0.40 over 5 years.

Is TEAD a good diversifier for RMT?

Reasonably. At 0.40, RMT and TEAD keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.40 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.40 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/rmt-vs-tead.json

RMT vs TEAD: 3-year weekly correlation 0.40RMT vs TEAD0.40

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![RMT vs TEAD correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/rmt-vs-tead.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/rmt-vs-tead/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: RMT correlations · TEAD correlations