PairBook
HomeRMM › RMM vs VXZ

RMM vs VXZ: Correlation

How closely do RiverNorth Managed Duration Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (RMM) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.43, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.43
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.34
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.35
long-run
Ann. covariance
-158.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are RMM and VXZ?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of RMM and VXZ correlate at -0.43, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.34 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.35, with an annualized covariance of -158.1 %².

Among the 11 assets we track against RMM, VXZ sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #11. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with RMM ahead by 30.3 points (+14.2% versus -16.1%). Risk is not evenly split, since VXZ carries 1.8 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

RMM vs VXZ: side by side

RMM (RiverNorth Managed Duration Municipal Income Fund, Inc.)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+14.2%-16.1%
5-year return-4.9%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)14.3%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.41-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-18.8%-36.4%
Market cap$0.3B
P/E (trailing)74.7
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: RMM -18.8% vs -36.4%Higher 5y return: RMM -4.9% vs -53.1%
-16%0%+17%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. RMM · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearRMMVXZ
2022-23.4%+0.5%
2023+5.9%-44.0%
2024+9.3%-12.7%
2025+2.1%+5.7%
2026+9.3%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are RMM and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.43 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between RMM and VXZ?

The RMM/VXZ correlation stands at -0.43 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.34, 5 years: -0.35), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for RMM?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.43 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.43 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.43 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/rmm-vs-vxz.json

RMM vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.43RMM vs VXZ-0.43

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![RMM vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/rmm-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/rmm-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: RMM correlations · VXZ correlations