PairBook
HomeRMD › RMD vs ZCMD

RMD vs ZCMD: Correlation

How closely do ResMed (RMD) and Zhongchao Inc. - Class A (ZCMD) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.18, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.18
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.05
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.10
long-run
Ann. covariance
-803.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are RMD and ZCMD?

Over the past 3 years, RMD and ZCMD moved with a correlation of -0.18, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (-0.05) than the 3-year average (-0.18). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.10, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -803.4 %².

Among the 29 assets we track against RMD, ZCMD ranks #23 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months RMD outperformed by 84.4 percentage points (-15.5% for RMD against -99.9% for ZCMD). Risk is not evenly split, since ZCMD carries 4.5 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

RMD vs ZCMD: side by side

RMD (ResMed)ZCMD (Zhongchao Inc. - Class A)
1-year return-15.5%-99.9%
5-year return-14.6%-100.0%
Volatility (ann.)31.2%141.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.790.59
Max drawdown (3Y)-37.3%-100.0%
Market cap$34.0B
P/E (trailing)22.6
Dividend yield1.02%0.00%
Sector / categoryHealth CareUS Listed
Higher yield: RMD 1.02% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: RMD -37.3% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: RMD -14.6% vs -100.0%
-100%0%+32%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). RMD · ZCMD

Year-by-year returns

YearRMDZCMD
2022-19.5%-35.4%
2023-16.5%-69.5%
2024+34.2%-53.8%
2025+6.3%-72.2%
2026-1.3%-99.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are RMD and ZCMD good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.18, RMD and ZCMD have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between RMD and ZCMD?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.18 over 3 years, with -0.05 over the last year and -0.10 over 5 years.

Is ZCMD a good diversifier for RMD?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.18, RMD and ZCMD have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.18 mean?

A reading of -0.18 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/rmd-vs-zcmd.json

RMD vs ZCMD: 3-year weekly correlation -0.18RMD vs ZCMD-0.18

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![RMD vs ZCMD correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/rmd-vs-zcmd.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/rmd-vs-zcmd/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: RMD correlations · ZCMD correlations